Puri S, Thakur AN, Meshram HS, Bhagat C, Modasia B, Batheja V, Mathur RP. Vaccination gaps in incident hemodialysis patients: An opportunity for preventive nephrology, a prospective, cross-sectional study. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 114748 [PMID: 41884249 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.114748]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I humbly thanks the Editor and entire team for making the entire process so smooth and publishing my article, I also thank the peer reviewer for quick peer review with constructive criticism and comments to improve the article. The entire process from submission to publication was very fast with prompt replies and genuine, scientific team and language editing team also did a quick evaluation, which in turn lead to rapid publication. At last also thankyou for the invitation for the article and waiving the article processing fee which helped a me as there was no funding for the study.
Thankyou to the entire team once again
Reply from the Editorial Office
Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. We would love to work with you again!